use strict;
my $str = 'Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago Press.
Albu OB and Flyverbom M (2016) Organizational transparency: conceptualizations, con-
ditions, and consequences. Business & Society. Epub ahead of print 13 July. DOI:
10.1177/0007650316659851.
Ananny M (2016) Toward an ethics of algorithms: convening, observation, probability, and timeli-
ness. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(1): 93–117. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915606523.
Anderson CW (2013) Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New
Media & Society 15(7): 1005–1021. DOI: 10.1177/1461444812465137.
Arnoldi J (2015) Computer algorithms, market manipulation and the institutionalization of high
frequency trading. Theory, Culture & Society 33: 29–52.
Bacon M (2012) Pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Baecker R (1998) Sorting out sorting: a case study of software visualization for teaching computer
science. In: Stasko J (ed.) Software Visualization Programming as a Multimedia Experience.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 369–381.
Ball C (2009) What is transparency? Public Integrity 11(4): 293–308.
Barany MJ and MacKenzie D (2014) Chalk: materials and concepts in mathematics research. In:
Coopmans C, Vertesi J, Lynch M, et al. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 107–130.
Bateson G (2000) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry,
Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Birchall C (2011) Introduction to “secrecy and transparency”: the politics of opacity and openness.
Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 7–25.
Birchall C (2014) Radical transparency? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14(1): 77–88.
Bratich J (2016) Occult(ing) transparency: an epilogue. International Journal of Communication
Systems 10: 178–181.
Brill J (2015) Scalable approaches to transparency and accountability in decisionmaking algo-
rithms: remarks at the NYU conference on algorithms and accountability. Federal Trade
Commission, 28 February. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/pub-
lic_statements/629681/150228nyualgorithms.pdf
Brown MH (1998) A taxonomy of algorithm animation displays. In: Stasko J (ed.) Software
Visualization Programming as a Multimedia Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press,
pp. 35–42.
Browne S (2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University
Press.
Burrell J (2016) How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms.
Big Data & Society 3(1). DOI: 10.1177/2053951715622512.
Carusi A and Hoel AS (2014) Toward a new ontology of scientific vision. In: Coopmans C, Vertesi
J, Lynch M, et al. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The
MIT Press, pp. 201–221.
Christensen LT and Cheney G (2015) Peering into transparency: challenging ideals, proxies, and
organizational practices. Communication Theory 25(1): 70–90.
Coddington M (2012) Defending a paradigm by patrolling a boundary: two global newspapers’
approach to WikiLeaks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(3): 377–396.
Coleman G (2013) Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Coopmans C, Vertesi J, Lynch M, et al. (2014) Introduction. In: Coopmans C, Vertesi J, Lynch M,
et al. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press,
pp. 1–12.
Crain M (2016) The limits of transparency: data brokers and commodification. New Media &
Society. Epub ahead of print 7 July. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816657096.
Crain W (2000) Theories and Development: Concepts and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Crary J (1990) Techniques of the Observer. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Crawford K (2016) Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics.
Science, Technology & Human Values 41(1): 77–92.
da Vinci L (2015) Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci (trans. JP Richter). Istanbul: eKitap Projesi.
Daston L (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science 22(4):
597–618.
Daston L and Galison P (2007) Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
Datta A, Tschantz MC and Datta A (2015) Automated experiments on ad privacy settings.
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 1: 92–112.
David M (2015) The correspondence theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 28
May Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/
De Rijcke S and Beaulieu A (2014) Networked neuroscience: brain scans and visual knowing at
the intersection of atlases and databases. In: Coopmans C, Vertesi J, Lynch M, et al. (eds)
Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 131–
152.
Dewey J (1997) Experience and Education. New York: Free Press.
Diakopoulos N (2016) Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the
ACM 59(2): 56–62.
DiSalvo C (2012) Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dougherty C (2015) Google photos mistakenly labels black people “gorillas.” The New York
Times, 1 July. Available at: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/google-photos-mistak-
enly-labels-black-people-gorillas/
Driscoll K and Walker S (2014) Working within a black box: transparency in the collection
and production of big Twitter data. International Journal of Communication Systems 8:
1745–1764.
Eslami M, Rickman A, Vaccaro K, et al. (2015) “I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close
to [her]”: reasoning about invisible algorithms in the news feed. In: Proceedings of the 33rd
annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea,
18–23 April.
Flyverbom M (2016) Transparency: mediation and the management of visibilities. International
Journal of Communication Systems 10: 110–122.
Fox J (2007) The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in
Practice 17(4–5): 663–671.
Fung A, Graham M and Weil D (2008) Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gillespie T (2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: Gillespie T, Boczkowski P and Foot KA (eds)
Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press, pp. 167–194.
Glasser TL (1989) Three views on accountability. In: Dennis EE, Gillmor DM and Glasser TL
(eds) Media Freedom and Accountability. New York: Praeger.
Goodwin C (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606–633.
Greenwald G (2014) No Place to Hide. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Hallinan B and Striphas T (2014) Recommended for you: the Netflix Prize and the production of
algorithmic culture. New Media & Society 18: 117–137.
Hansen HK and Flyverbom M (2015) The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowl-
edge in the digital age. Organization 22(6): 872–889.
Heald D (2006) Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy 135: 25–43.
Heemsbergen L (2016) From radical transparency to radical disclosure: reconfiguring (in)vol-
untary transparency through the management of visibilities. International Journal of
Communication Systems 10: 138–151.
Hilgartner S (2000) Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press.
Hood C (2006) Transparency in historical perspective. In: Hood C and Heald D (eds) Transparency:
The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–23.
James W (1997) What pragmatism means. In: Menand L (ed.) Pragmatism: A Reader. New York:
Random House, pp. 93–111.
Kelty C (2008) Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Kushner S (2013) The freelance translation machine: algorithmic culture and the invisible indus-
try. New Media & Society 15: 1241–1258.
Leigh D and Harding L (2011) WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange’s War on Secrecy. New York:
Public Affairs.
Levy KEC (2015) The contexts of control: information, power, and truck-driving work. Information
Society 31(2): 160–174.
Levy KEC and Johns DM (2016) When open data is a Trojan Horse: the weaponization of trans-
parency in science and governance. Big Data & Society 3(1). http://bds.sagepub.com/con-
tent/3/1/2053951715621568
Lynch M and Woolgar S (1988) Introduction: sociological orientations to representational practice
in science. Human Studies 11(2): 99–116.
Mackenzie A (2015) The production of prediction: what does machine learning want? European
Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4–5): 429–445.
Mackenzie D (2008) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge,
MA: The MIT Press.
Michaels D (2008) Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your
Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Minsky M (2007) The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the
Future of the Human Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Misak C (ed.) (2007) New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Napoli PM (2014) Automated media: an institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media
production and consumption. Communication Theory 24(3): 340–360.
Neyland D and Möllers N (2016) Algorithmic IF ... THEN rules and the conditions and conse-
quences of power. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (1): 45-62.
Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic
Books.
Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and
Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Phillips JWP (2011) Secrecy and transparency: an interview with Samuel Weber. Theory, Culture
& Society 28(7–8): 158–172.
Resnick M, Berg R and Eisenberg M (2000) Beyond black boxes: bringing transparency and aes-
thetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9(1): 7–30.
Schnackenberg AK and Tomlinson EC (2014) Organizational transparency: a new perspective
on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management 42:
1784–1810.
Schrock AR (2016) Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: a history from publicity to open
government data. New Media & Society 18: 581–599.
Schudson M (2015) The Rise of the Right to Know. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Publishing.
Squires CR (2002) Rethinking the black public sphere: an alternative vocabulary for multiple
public spheres. Communication Theory 12(4): 446–468.
Stiny G (1980) Kindergarten grammars: designing with Froebel’s building gifts. Environment and
Planning B 7(4): 409–462.
Stohl C, Stohl M and Leonardi PM (2016) Managing opacity: information visibility and the para-
dox of transparency in the digital age. International Journal of Communication Systems 10:
123–137.
Striphas T (2015) Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4–5): 395–412.
Tkacz N (2015) Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Turner F (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network,
and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Turner F (2013) The Democratic Surround. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vertesi J (2014) Drawing as: distinctions and disambiguation in digital images of Mars. In:
Coopmans C, Vertesi J, Lynch M, et al. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 15–36.
Wade L (2010) HP software doesn’t see black people. Sociological Images, 5 January. Available
at: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/01/05/hp-software-doesnt-see-black-people/
Ward SC (1996) Reconfiguring Truth. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zara C (2015) FTC chief technologist Ashkan Soltani on algorithmic transparency and the
fight against biased bots. International Business Times, 9 April. Available at: http://www.
ibtimes.com/ftc-chief-technologist-ashkan-soltani-algorithmic-transparency-fight-against-
biased-1876177';
my $regex = qr/(([\w\s]+)\(([1|2]\d{3})\))(.*)/ump;
if ( $str =~ /$regex/g ) {
print "Whole match is ${^MATCH} and its start/end positions can be obtained via \$-[0] and \$+[0]\n";
# print "Capture Group 1 is $1 and its start/end positions can be obtained via \$-[1] and \$+[1]\n";
# print "Capture Group 2 is $2 ... and so on\n";
}
# ${^POSTMATCH} and ${^PREMATCH} are also available with the use of '/p'
# Named capture groups can be called via $+{name}
Please keep in mind that these code samples are automatically generated and are not guaranteed to work. If you find any syntax errors, feel free to submit a bug report. For a full regex reference for Perl, please visit: http://perldoc.perl.org/perlre.html